Here is a link from a right wing site hailing the new ad. Bonus points for the misspelled headline.
New NO On Porposal 2 Video
As for how the Hatch Act applies to police officers, this is from the Fraternal Order of Police. The uniform and badge in the political ad are not permissible.
The Hatch Act: The Political Process and You
It is permissible for officers to:
- Endorse or oppose a partisan political candidate in a political advertisement, broadcast, campaign literature, or similar material, so long as the officer is not on duty and not wearing a uniform, badge or insignia;
It is impermissible to:
- Allow one’s name or likeness to be used in campaign literature in the police officer’s professional capacity;Because the Detroit Police Department receives Federal grants for a number of different department functions, there is a good chance the Hatch Act restrictions would apply here. The question may also depend on if Proposals are subjected to the same restrictions as political campaigns involving elected officials. Either way this officer has run afoul of the law, the code, or ethics. He should not wear that badge while he's advocating his personal politics.
For more about how Rick Snyder and Michigan's Tea Party legislature have specifically targeted teachers unions for cost cutting while leaving other public unions off the hook I suggest this earlier post.
Pathteacher: Snyder's policy for Michigan schools.. Teachers lose, janitors win. Bravo.
For reference, here is the wording of Proposal 2.
PROPOSAL 12-2
A PROPOSAL TO AMEND THE STATE CONSTITUTION REGARDING COLLECTIVE BARGAINING
This proposal would:
- Grant public and private employees the constitutional right to organize and bargain collectively through labor unions.
- Invalidate existing or future state or local laws that limit the ability to join unions and bargain collectively, and to negotiate and enforce collective bargaining agreements, including employees’ financial support of their labor unions. Laws may be enacted to prohibit public employees from striking.
- Override state laws that regulate hours and conditions of employment to the extent that those laws conflict with collective bargaining agreements.
- Define “employer” as a person or entity employing one or more employees.
YES __
NO ____
What about the officers that support it? Aren't they illegal too?
ReplyDeleteApparently it's all OK, heck the Michigan Attorney General was in a commercial politicking against the proposal as well. But then AG Schuette never let laws stop him before.
ReplyDeleteJust wonder when you drank the kool-aid and become a liberal
ReplyDelete